Loading...
Standard Guide for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Site Screening and Initial Characterization
1.1Â Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of over 7,000 manmade compounds consisting of polymeric chains of carbon bonded to fluorine atoms, usually with a polar functional group at the head. This guide recognizes that PFAS can be categorized as polymeric or nonpolymeric, collectively amounting to more than 4,700 Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)-registered substances.
Environmental concerns pertaining to PFAS are centered primarily on the perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAA), a subclass of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, which display extreme persistence and chain-length dependent bioaccumulation and adverse effects in biota.
1.2Â The regulatory framework for PFAS continues to evolve, both domestically and internationally. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proceeding with a wide-ranging set of PFAS regulatory actions (EPA, 2021).
While the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) does not currently recognize PFAS as hazardous substances, the statute does require actions to protect public health and the environment from contaminants and pollutants released to the environment. Other federal regulatory programs, such as the Safe Drinking Water Act are being used to address drinking water supplies adversely impacted by releases of PFAS.
The Clean Water Act’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program is tool that both federal and state regulators are using to regulate the inflows of PFAS-impacted wastewaters at both publicly-owned treatment works (POTW) and federally-owned wastewater treatment plants and the concentration of PFAS in permitted effluent.
EPA continues to add additional per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances to the list of substances reportable under the federal Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) reporting program. International efforts to address per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances include:
1.3Â Hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDF) currently operating under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) via a Part B Permit may be ordered to investigate releases of PFAS under a RCRA Corrective Action order.
EPA made a policy decision in the 1990s to defer many potential CERCLA enforcement actions to the RCRA Corrective Action Program (EPA, 1999). Permitted TSDFs at refineries may be subject to RCRA Corrective Action, as opposed to other regulatory programs, to address the releases of PFAS associated past and current use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF).
1.4Â Numerous states and Tribes are using their existing regulatory programs to direct investigation, site remediation, and correction action related to releases of PFAS to soil, groundwater, and surface waters. These actions range from health advisories and guidelines to enforceable regulatory standards.
Regulatory considerations include PFAS risks to both human health and ecological receptors that are protected under a broad array of federal, state, and tribal regulatory programs as well as by treaty rights.
1.5Â This guide assists users in the identification of real property concerns that may be the source of PFAS releases or that may be adversely impacted by releases of PFAS. The goal of this guide is to assist managers of environmental risk in their resource allocation decision-making.
1.6 This guide does not constitute “All Appropriate Inquiries” as defined in 40 CFR Part 312 and is not intended to provide the user with any of the landowner liability protections codified in CERCLA §101(35)(A)(i), CERCLA §101(40)(B)(iii), or CERCLA §107(q)(1)(A)(viii).
1.7Â This guide describes widely accepted considerations and best practices used in the site screening and initial site characterization process, with specific consideration of the potential for the release of PFAS into the environment. This guide complements but does not replace existing technical guidance and regulatory requirements.
1.8Â This guide does not address and is not applicable to sampling and analysis of public or private domestic water supply systems subject to regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act and state private well testing act requirements.
Regulatory agencies responsible for implementing the Safe Drinking Water Act may have established sampling and reporting requirements for public, community, and privately operated water systems.
1.9Â All references to specific federal or state programs are current as of the date of publication. The user is cautioned not to rely on this guide alone but to consult directly with the appropriate program and legal counsel regarding this complex and rapidly evolving concern.
1.10Â This guide is intended to complement, not replace, existing regulatory requirements or guidance. ASTM International (ASTM) guides are not regulations; they are consensus-based standards that may be followed as needed.
1.11 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. Other units, such as fractional units of parts per billion (ppb) and parts per trillion (ppt), are also included in this guide.
1.12Â This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.13Â This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
1.1Â Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of over 7,000 manmade compounds consisting of polymeric chains of carbon bonded to fluorine atoms, usually with a polar functional group at the head. This guide recognizes that PFAS can be categorized as polymeric or nonpolymeric, collectively amounting to more than 4,700 Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)-registered substances.
Environmental concerns pertaining to PFAS are centered primarily on the perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAA), a subclass of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, which display extreme persistence and chain-length dependent bioaccumulation and adverse effects in biota.
1.2Â The regulatory framework for PFAS continues to evolve, both domestically and internationally. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proceeding with a wide-ranging set of PFAS regulatory actions (EPA, 2021).
While the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) does not currently recognize PFAS as hazardous substances, the statute does require actions to protect public health and the environment from contaminants and pollutants released to the environment.
Other federal regulatory programs, such as the Safe Drinking Water Act, are being used to address drinking water supplies adversely impacted by releases of PFAS. The Clean Water Act’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program is a tool that both federal and state regulators are using to regulate the inflows of PFAS-impacted wastewaters at both publicly-owned treatment works (POTW) and federally-owned wastewater treatment plants and the concentration of PFAS in permitted effluent.
EPA continues to add additional per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances to the list of substances reportable under the federal Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) reporting program.
International efforts to address per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances include:
1.3Â Hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDF) currently operating under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) via a Part B Permit may be ordered to investigate releases of PFAS under a RCRA Corrective Action order.
EPA made a policy decision in the 1990s to defer many potential CERCLA enforcement actions to the RCRA Corrective Action Program (EPA, 1999).
Permitted TSDFs at refineries may be subject to RCRA Corrective Action, as opposed to other regulatory programs, to address the releases of PFAS associated with past and current use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF).
1.4Â Numerous states and Tribes are using their existing regulatory programs to direct investigation, site remediation, and corrective action related to releases of PFAS to soil, groundwater, and surface waters. These actions range from health advisories and guidelines to enforceable regulatory standards.
Regulatory considerations include PFAS risks to both human health and ecological receptors that are protected under a broad array of federal, state, and tribal regulatory programs as well as by treaty rights.
1.5Â This guide assists users in the identification of real property concerns that may be the source of PFAS releases or that may be adversely impacted by releases of PFAS. The goal of this guide is to assist managers of environmental risk in their resource allocation decision-making.
1.6 This guide does not constitute “All Appropriate Inquiries” as defined in 40 CFR Part 312 and is not intended to provide the user with any of the landowner liability protections codified in CERCLA §101(35)(A)(i), CERCLA §101(40)(B)(iii), or CERCLA §107(q)(1)(A)(viii).
1.7Â This guide describes widely accepted considerations and best practices used in the site screening and initial site characterization process, with specific consideration of the potential for the release of PFAS into the environment. This guide complements but does not replace existing technical guidance and regulatory requirements.
1.8Â This guide does not address and is not applicable to sampling and analysis of public or private domestic water supply systems subject to regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act and state private well testing act requirements.
Regulatory agencies responsible for implementing the Safe Drinking Water Act may have established sampling and reporting requirements for public, community, and privately operated water systems.
1.9Â All references to specific federal or state programs are current as of the date of publication. The user is cautioned not to rely on this guide alone but to consult directly with the appropriate program and legal counsel regarding this complex and rapidly evolving concern.
1.10Â This guide is intended to complement, not replace, existing regulatory requirements or guidance. ASTM International (ASTM) guides are not regulations; they are consensus-based standards that may be followed as needed.
1.11 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. Other units, such as fractional units of parts per billion (ppb) and parts per trillion (ppt), are also included in this guide.
1.12Â This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.13Â This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
PFAS are widely used in commercial and industrial applications worldwide (see Fig. 1). PFAS are of concern due to their documented persistence and their studied impacts on human health and the environment. While there is no comprehensive source of information on the many individual PFAS substances and their functions in different applications, a range of resources are available to the practitioner. This guide provides information to assist the practitioner in navigating these challenges during the initial screening and site characterization process.
The user should note that PFAS regulatory management frameworks at the federal and state level are evolving quickly. Therefore, consultation with legal and technical representatives with knowledge of federal, state, and local PFAS regulations is advised prior to use of this guide. Environmental audit policies or privileges may be applicable to some of the steps described in this guide (see EPA, 2000).
Multi-step Risk Management Framework:
The actions described in this guide are intended to provide a multi-step risk management framework to confirm, with reasonable certainty, that PFAS may have been used at a federally-owned, publicly-owned, or privately-owned property. This standard provides guidance on how to focus limited resources on using a multi-step process, illustrated in Fig. 2, to identify property potentially impacted by on-site or off-site uses and releases of PFAS. Section 4.5 describes the use and occurrence of PFAS. Section 4.6 describes activities at government and federal installations where PFAS use is expected. Section 4.7 broadly outlines the industry sectors where the use of PFAS has been documented (GlĂĽge, 2020 (2), Gaines, 2022 (3)).
PFAs History and Use:
In the 1940s, industrial processes to commercially produce PFAS were first developed. Since then, PFAS have been used to make many industrial and consumer products worldwide. Since the 1950s, PFAS have been widely used in surface treatment applications for paper, fabric, cookware, and carpeting which allows these products and materials to repel oil, water, and stains. In the 1960s, the United States Navy used PFAS to develop Aqueous Film Forming Foam products for firefighting applications and the technology was patented by the U.S. Navy. Since the 1960s, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized several broad classes of PFAS for use in food contact substances due to their non-stick and grease, oil, and water-resistant properties. Over the past 50 years, PFAS use has expanded in food and consumer products manufacturing and packaging and industrial operations and applications worldwide. Restrictions or prohibitions on the use of PFAS in food and consumer products have been enacted at the State and local level.
Release of PFAS during manufacture into the atmosphere may have occurred, and may be continuing to occur, followed by subsequent redeposition of PFAS materials on land where PFAS can enter surface water and groundwater. Other potential sources of PFAS emissions are dry cleaning and commercial laundry operations where clothing coated with PFAS-containing materials is cleaned or laundered. Emissions from these sources may include particulate matter such as lint. Additionally, PFAS may be or have been discharged without treatment to wastewater treatment plants or landfills, and eventually be released into the environment by treatment systems that are not designed to mitigate PFAS. Industrial discharges of PFAS were unregulated for many years; however, change is underway in the U.S. at both the state and federal level as well as internationally.
Broadly, consumer and industrial uses of PFAS-containing products and waste may release PFAS into landfills and landfill leachate, and into municipal wastewater, where it may accumulate undetected in biosolids which may be land applied. PFAS may be subsequently used in soil amendments used to grow animal feed and food crops and produce for human consumption. The user should be aware that federal, tribal, state, and municipal regulations affecting the management of PFAS, including air emissions, wastewater discharges, biosolids, groundwater, surface water, and impacted soil are rapidly evolving and may include additional reporting requirements. (4)
PFAs Use and Occurrence:
PFAS containing chemicals have been used in a broad spectrum of federal and commercial activities, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The use of PFAS as a component of AFFF for firefighting at military installations, refineries, petrochemical manufacturing facilities, tank farms, and airports is well known. PFAS are used as coatings for fabric and paper products to repel water and grease (see ITRC’s PFAS Technical Guide). PFAS have also been components of vapor control mists for electroplating operations. Other industrial uses of PFAS are described in this section as well.
Government and Military Installations Use of PFAs:
PFAS have been used in a variety of applications at government/military facilities, including as a component in AFFF, which was routinely used at fire-fighting training areas and equipment test areas and is still used at crash sites and some fire suppression systems in hangars. In addition, PFAS has been a component of mist-suppression compounds associated with electroplating operations at federal facilities and government-owned, contractor-operated (GOCO) research and development plants. The wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) at federal installations may release PFAS as emissions and may discharge PFAS into receiving waters as effluent. The biosolids produced by the WWTP may contain PFAS if PFAS were present in the influent.
Current and historical AFFF storage and transfer areas at federally-owned facilities are of potential concern for release to the environment. Historical reports of uncontrolled spills and the repeated use of AFFF during fire training and firefighting have been correlated with higher concentrations of PFAS in surface water and groundwater. Discharges of liquids from fire-f
| SDO | ASTM: ASTM International |
| Document Number | E3358 |
| Publication Date | Aug. 1, 2023 |
| Language | en - English |
| Page Count | 23 |
| Revision Level | 23a |
| Supercedes | |
| Committee | E50.04 |
Failed to load document history.
| Publish Date | Document Id | Type | View |
|---|